New Game, New Rules
Calls-to-action like “while supplies last” and “for a limited time only” with the oft-repeated phone number were once?the bread and butter of direct response advertising. In the old days, DR campaigns were easy to measure by the number of phone calls brands received from their ads. Technology has had a massive impact on how consumers react to DR calls-to-action. Even though people have their phones in their hands now more than ever, they’re actually less likely to pick up the phone and call. Why? Because in this instant access era, a disrupter has entered the equation and it has caused a paradigm shift — not just in terms of key performance indicators, but also in how we interpret them.?Instead of immediately dialing their way to deals, consumers now search for a? brand or product online before taking action.This extra step mandates a new way of thinking for DR advertisers.
DR advertisers have spent billions on radio, TV, and print ads asking people to “call now;” they’ve invested thousands of dollars on vanity numbers like 800 NEW-LOOK or 888-888-8888 (many even going so far as to name their companies after a vanity number — 800-FLOWERS, anyone?); and they’ve philosophized endlessly about when and how best to optimally mention a phone number during 30- or 60-second spots. (By the way, we believe three is the magic number.) Are these concerns all made moot by the changing DR landscape? We’ve noticed an interesting phenomenon that tells us otherwise.?
The Cost-Per-Call Conundrum
When we begin a new radio or TV advertising campaign, the initial cost-per-call is usually low. Phones are ringing off the hook and clients are naming their first-born kids after us. (Okay, we may be exaggerating — but only slightly.) During this phase, we also begin to see a web traffic baseline emerging which corresponds with the ad’s air time.
However, as more frequent airings occur, calls-per-airing start to decline, and panic ensues among clients who believe that cost-per-calls should be dropping rather than spiking. As it turns out, there’s an explanation. We’ve realized that roughly 70 percent of consumers use the phone number to learn about a company compared to 30 percent who use the web at the onset of a campaign.?
As ads continue to air, however, the percentage of people who make contact online increases due to rising brand awareness. In other words, the more familiar consumers are with a brand, they?less phone number dependent they become. Instead, they simply remember the company’s name and Google it.
The takeaway? While the cost-per-call may indeed be rising, these numbers don’t fully reflect what’s happening. Not only do DR campaigns gain traction as brands become top-of-mind with consumers, but calls also become better qualified.?And here’s the really troubling part: We’ve seen our fair share of advertisers kill broadcast campaigns at the first uptick in cost-per-call only to see web traffic tank in the process.
DR Gets a Reboot?
So given this emerging trend in consumer behavior, here’s the big question: how do advertisers best use their limited time and budgets to build a more compelling case for consumers? ?What about if viewed through the lens of trading initial low cost-per-call for eventual brand recognition?? Or if you could determine the exact point at which a cost-per-call strategy starts to drive web traffic, increase brand awareness and yield more qualified calls?
Leveraging Multi-Channel Attribution Into Insights
It’s our business at Wingman to help clients more easily and accurately navigate these uncharted waters by matching web traffic with specific broadcast airings across TV and radio. Our audience management platform gives advertisers a complete, 360-degree view of how their media dollars are working, precisely pinpointing where web traffic and cost-per-call rise and — ultimately — intersect. This protects advertisers from pulling their campaigns when they’re still growing by acknowledging that cost-per-call is just one small part of the “big picture” in today’s “Google first and ask questions later” world.?